Permalink for Comment #1375445397 by jaredprox

, comment by jaredprox
jaredprox @23piper said:
My takeaway from the set list and the way it is described in this review is that this was an average show with two good jams in Fuego and Ghost and an unusual and interesting Tube in the first set. Doesn't seem like one I'd pay to download. Am I misreading?
Nope, you're right. The first set had the strangeness factor b/c of the storm/late start--so it's unique as far as first frames go. The second set had the OMG> segue> OMG factor b/c no one knew how long they'd play. But since we all know what they played, OMG doesn't matter for d-load.

It's a sexy setlist, but yes, Fuego and Ghost are the only stepp'in on out jams.

I thought the Hood was underwhelming. They played it well, but bag it, tag it--sounds like 30 others from 3.0. Maybe GW's stellar version is jading me out here?


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode